Monday, February 26, 2007

Twitter With Me

I started a Twitter account, based on the idea that it'll help me keep track of people at SXSW. Stupid idea? Not sure yet. Come be my friend and we'll find out together.

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

Oscar Stuff

Today on Netscape:

"Nobody watches the Academy Awards to find out what the kids are into. It's not about celebrating trends, it's about placing new cultural products within the historical context of Old Hollywood, thus confirming a given movie's status as capital-A Art. To incorporate intentional, "ironic" amateurism into an institution designed to legitimize factory-produced mass entertainments undermines the entire enterprise."

Read the whole story here.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Thursday, February 22, 2007

More O.C. Outtakes

My story on the finale of The O.C. was cut from 2,500 words to about 1,000. Here are the outtakes; the rest of the article was just published here.

It may be inevitable that all ensemble cast prime-time dramas about the lives of wealthy teens in Southern California be compared to 90210, but The O.C. would seem to share more with its FOX ancestor than the obvious lifestyle porn trappings. For one thing, 90210 was it's own kind of "trojan horse". As Crystal Kile describes at length in the online journal Bad Subjects, what keeps Aaron Spelling's masterpiece grounded in fantasy is that, though it pretended to be about ordinary teens living in an extraordinary community, in practice, it used its contemporary teenager protagonists as vehicles for a very Baby boomer-specific nostalgia, for a time in which Southern California represented a sunny, upper-middle-class utopia, free of pre-millennial tension and late-20th-century social blight. As Kile puts it, "the popular genius of 90210 is that while it is superficially topical-n-relevant ... it also evinces a deep, yet blank 'nostalgia for the 'kinder, gentler,' 'California youth-cult mythos' of the late 1950s and early 1960s., nostalgia for the myth of Southern California as paradise for Midwestern WASPs, as Gidget-land, as Disneyland."

That type of nostalgia is all over The O.C. It's there in the show's theme song, a non-ironic ode to sun and surf called "California" by the band Phantom Planet. It's there in the character of Seth's dad, Sandy, a Brooklyn Jew who followed his idealism to Berkeley, only to fall in love with the heiress of a real estate mogul and find himself ensnared in the Orange County elite. Sandy is often seen returning to the Cohen mansion still in his wetsuit after an early morning surf in the Pacific; surfing, he says, is his only respite from his apparently soul-crushing existence living off his wife's fortune. Maybe most of all, that mid-century nostalgia is present in the very plot device that allows the Cohen's ad-hoc family to come together: what could be more in line with "Gidget-land" idealism than the idea that a juvenile delinquent is really a good, smart person who has simply been dealt a bad hand in life, and who can completely turn his life around if sent to a private high school and invited to live in a rich family's pool house?

The other major area where 90210 and The O.C. clearly overlap is merchandising. Just a preteen when the show premiered, I can attest to the lure of 90210-mania: I had the t-shirts, the calendar, the Dylan McKay and Brenda Walls dolls. But not all of 90210's attempts at brand extension met with success; I remember being puzzled when a Beverly Hills 90210 soundtrack album was released, containing songs from Paula Abdul and Color Me Badd. Nearly every cultural reference within the first few seasons of 90210 pointed back in time. The one time the gang went to contemporary dance party, the experience was used, as Kile notes, to code contemporary L.A. as a dangerous wasteland, reinforcing the notion that the 90210 kids were better off listening to golden oldies at their one hangout, the 50s dine The Peach Pit. Releasing an album of early-90s dance pop under the 90210 brand was an obvious gimmick, one which felt false to this middle-schooler, who had developed a taste for the Beach Boys and Rebel Without a Cause solely through 90210's incessant plugging of such relics. My taste for 90210 dissipated soon after.

The issues surrounding The O.C.'s cultural influence became murkier when MTV launched Laguna Beach in 2004. At the time, though the FOX show wasn't an all-around ratings winner, it was considered appointment television for the very valuable 18-24 demographic. "At it's peak, The O.C. ruled the conversation at work and school the next day," Toomey confirms. "During the freshman season, it was all anyone was talking about." According to Gawker.com, MTV's original plan was to shoot an unscripted drama (read: reality show with heavy coaching and dramatic editing) at Beverly Hills High, but they decided to scrap that and move the operation to a private high school in Orange County, in order to capitalize on the popularity of The O.C. To that end, MTV added a subtitle to their show: "The Real Orange County."

You almost need a statistician to graph out the intertwined ironies that command the relationship between The O.C., Laguna Beach, and their separate but demographically equal audiences. For one thing, adults who watch The O.C. seem to be extremely protective of "their show" -- every O.C. fan I approached for this article insisted that the ascendancy of Laguna Beach couldn't have had anything to do with The O.C.'s second-season ratings drop, although a simple glance at the numbers would suggest otherwise. Within the world of mid-00s pop culture, the two shows resemble opposing cliques at the same high school. Laguna Beach represents the impossibly popular kids; standing in for typical high school lore's cheerleaders and athletes, they drive the best cars, have the best hair, and seem to live parent-less lives free of substance and consequences. On the other side, The O.C. stands in for the typical middle-class teenager who struggles with his/her identity, who tells the world how they feel through their taste in movies, books, comics, bands and clothes. These differences are compounded by each show's distinct mode of letting the audience in. The O.C., which is presented in traditional shot-reverse shot style, shows us its fictionalized Orange County community primarily through the eyes of Ryan, the brainy-but-scrappy outsider who can never quite catch up with the other kids in terms of class and coolness. Laguna Beach, a supposed reality show, presents its sort-of-real but clearly fictionalized Orange County community in extreme close-up, with cameras mounted inside SUVs and balanced on shoulders inside jacuzzis. Occasional intro narration aside, there's no single protagonist mediating the action -- which places the viewer in the role of the brainy-but-scrappy outsider who can never quite catch up with the other kids.

One show forces you to gawk at its coolness from afar, while the other invites you into the party. It's no wonder Laguna Beach gets the ratings, while The O.C. has to settle for the cultural influence. But here's where things start to get mind-bogglingly meta: Laguna Beach, in its rush to read hipness from what was being telegraphed from The O.C., sent a Journey song to millions of adolescent-owned iPods. Yes, that Journeyy.

Here's what happened: as part of an effort to demonstrate exactly how out-of-touch Ryan would be in Orange County as a refuge from Chino, the writers often had the character mention that Journey was his favorite band. When various plot theatrics would require the character to borrow Sandy's black SUV and take a drive back to his home town, Ryan would inevitably listen to Journey on the ride. This became an oft-repeated inside joke within the show, and within the pop culture surrounding it. Ryan also wore wife beaters as outerwear and used violence to solve pretty much all of his problems -- this was clearly not the character to be emulated. So, Journey never appeared on an O.C. soundtrack album, because the producers of the show weren't honestly suggesting that any cool contemporary teenager would actually drive down a highway listening to "Don't Stop Believing" cranked up to 11.

Somehow, MTV missed the irony. In July 2005, the second season of Laguna Beach premiered, and in it, a Laguna Beacher who has been away at college drives back to his hometown in his black SUV. The song playing on the soundtrack? Journey's "Don't Stop Believing." A week later, two songs from the episode's soundtrack had cracked the Top Ten Downloaded Singles chart on iTunes: "Just the Girl" by The Click Five, and Journey's "Don't Stop Believing." This phenomenon caused uber-cool indie rock tastemaker Scott Lapatine to declare on his blog, Stereogum, that "Laguna Beach is the new The O.C.". But though Steve Perry and friends no doubt appreciated the extra spare change earned from their new-found popularity, die-hard Journey fans went through the exact range of emotions described by Jonathan Toomey in reference to The O.C. Effect on indie rock. In a blog post dating back to January 2006, "Journey fan since the womb" Joe Colchester complained that his local bars were suddenly full of "crazy, young sorority sluts screaming, 'Just a small town girl, livin' in a...something...I love Journey!!!'' "They've become this band that everybody wants to like a lot but they don't care enough to learn anything else about them," Colchester griped. "Girls aren't debating whether the song "Lights" is really about San Francisco at their stupid-assed sorority 'cops and robbers' theme parties."

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

90210 Outtake

I'm writing a story for Netscape pegged to the demise of The O.C. I cut out the following tangent on 90210; I'm pasting it here to remind myself to revisit this theme someday.

For those who haven’t caught up with Aaron Spelling’s masterwork lately, here’s a brief refresher. The first three of the show’s ten seasons focused on Brandon and Brenda Walsh, Minnesota-bred teenage twins played by Jason Priestley and Shannon Doherty, who are transplanted to Southern California when their accountant father gets a promotion. Though 90210 devolved into a sub-par soap theatrics sometime shortly after the gang graduated from West Beverly High, the show was praised early on for its ability to deal with “serious issues” such as poverty, substance abuse and AIDS and still attract teens with its soapy packaging and cool veneer.

A typical episode had straight-arrow Brandon, apparently the only white teenager in Los Angeles whose parents demand he pay his own car insurance, getting a job as a bus boy in a trendy L.A. restaurant with a kitchen full of undocumented workers. When Brandon discovers his comrades are making less than minimum wage, he raises noble hell about the working conditions and quits. Just then, Brandon’s rich schoolmates Dylan happens to stop by the restaurant, invites Brandon to take a ride in his mint condition 356 Porsche Speedster, and hooks him up with a job as a waiter at a non-corporate 50’s theme diner staffed with white people. Brandon thus gets to take a stand against immigrant exploitation and quit a job that violates his principles, and simultaneously find salvation for both his bank account and his pride in an imaginary space based on 50s cultural myth. Beverly Hills 90210, at its peak, pretended to be about the lives of ordinary kids in a extraordinary setting; in actuality, it was about extraordinarily self-rightous teens in alternate reality which filtered early-90s culture through Baby Boomer nostalgia.

For a more detailed analysis of this phenomenon, see an excellent essay in the academic journal Bad Subjects, in which author Crystal Kile pins 90210’s nostalgic bent on pre-millenial tension.

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

Friday, February 16, 2007

The History of the 17th Century, Via You Tube, Chapter One: Your Methods Are Antiquated, Alexander Hamilton



For your President's Day viewing pleasure, see above. High school must be much easier to bear now that kids are allowed to get away with stuff like this. I love it that Aaron Burr is into Wu-Tang.

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

Plugging Away

Thursday, February 15, 2007

The Hub-bub Over "300" Or, Why Telling The Truth is Not A Crime

My alma mater Cinematical was at the center of a bit of controversy this week (and yes, this is totally inside baseball, so if you have no interest in The Politics of Bloggery, click away now).

Here's what happened: Erik Davis was representing the site at Berlinale, and a couple of days ago, he filed a report from the press screening of Frank Miller's 300, where, he said, the comic book adaptation was greeted to a "chorus of boos." That report earned an inordinately large amount of comments for a Cinematical post -- mostly from fanboys/girls who could/would not believe such blasphemy. One particularly innane commenter slammed Erik for being "incapable of standing behind" his hopes that the film would be good in the face of its utter craptasticness. Warner Brothers, who are releasing 300, are corporate cousins of Cinematical, and Erik soon felt pressure from all sides to retract his report, on the grounds that it was, at the very least, unnecessarily harsh, and at worst, completely inaccurate.

But it wasn't inaccurate. How do we know? Because other bloggers rushed to confirm the information within. And it's not just friends backing up friends; bloggers have no incentive to lie for one another, because the entire circle jerk of bloggery would end were everyone to voluntarily agree.

The lesson: it's simply stupid for anyone who believes they're being slandered by a blogger to demand a retraction. If the blogger really is making something up, other bloggers will take the opportunity to point out why the first blogger is full of shit, and then the initial report will lose all power. But if the blogger is telling the truth (and most of the time, we are, because it's just not worth the possible fallout to make anything up), even if you scare them into backing down, chances are another blogger out there will continue the meme. Even if the Cinematical editors had immediately wiped the post off the site (and I'm glad they didn't), it would have been too late to suppress the idea that 300 was a) booed, and b) is, as Filmbrain put it, "the new Showgirls".

I'm not denying that a film festival report such as this can cause damage to a film -- I saw how a handful of French boos completely blocked Marie Antoinette from reaching its intended audience. But instead of wanting the chatter to go away, in this case, Warners should embrace it. This is priceless market research -- this tells them that though they have no chance with the film snob crowd, they've got a large comic geek base that will stand by them no matter what. Even better, at this point, bloggers that would have slammed the pic closer to its release will have heard enough to completely avoid it. It's a win/win!

Labels: , ,


Continue reading...

Monday, February 12, 2007

Technorati WTF?

I love this -- Technorati asks its users to explain the appeal behind the day's hottest searches.

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

SXSW Ahoy

As you may have noticed, I've added a SXSW button to this page. Not only will I be attending the entire conference for the first time ever, but I've got three speaking things lined up. First up: on Saturday March 10, I've been asked to moderated a Film panel called "Which Niche is Which?", featuring indie marketing giants such as Eamonn Bowles and Peter Goldwyn. Then, on Sunday March 11 at 5pm, I'll be joining bloggy luminaries such as Nick Douglas and Amanda Congdon on an Interactive panel titled "The Rise of the Blogebrity"; I guess they called me because they needed the washed-up corporate whore perspective. Finally, at 1:30 on Tuesday the 13th, I'm going to be the subject of a StudioSX interview. I've been asked to name a topic to discuss, and I'm having trouble nailing down something specific, so if you have any ideas, please let me know. Obviously, something involving the nexus of film and online journalism would be ideal.

Labels: , , ,


Continue reading...

Monday, February 05, 2007

Fact Checking Sharon Waxman...Again

Questioning Sharon Waxman's reportage skills is not exactly a groundbreaking endeavor. I'm not only not the first to hop this train; I actually hopped it myself two years ago, in a short-lived column on Cinematical where I called out Waxman and friends for pumping the box-office-slump vein that was all the rage the summer of 2005 (succeeding regimes have, for reasons unknown to me, taken the heading in a different direction).

I'm not particularly eager to sink into old habits, but Waxy's playground latest conversion of laziness into dollars (possible subtitles: "I H8 David O. Russell"; "Writer's Block Makes Cameron Crowe Nostalgic For An Imaginary Lost Era"; "Laura Ziskind, An Important Artist When She Produced Fight Club, Is Now Just A Sellout") inspired me to crunch (or, at least, Google) some numbers.

I'm particularly concerned with Waxman's assesment that I <3> Huckabees, the fourth film directed by David O. Russell, is/was "disastrous." The actual sentence: "Mr. Russell, widely admired for his original mix of comedy and seriousness in Flirting With Disaster and Three Kings, has dropped from view since his disastrous I Heart Huckabees in 2004, and is not close to making a new film."

Waxman's personal relationship with Russell has been well documented. I like Russell's work very much, but even I can't defend his interpersonal skills; he is, reportedly, not just a New Age kook, but a New Age kook who likes to beat up his more famous colleagues (search this page for the terms "fistfight" and "headlock"), and that's just unspeakably offensive. Still, for a first-stringer at what is suppossedly the nation's classiest daily paper, Waxman has proven that she's not above leveling petty threats: an email sent from the journalist to the director shortly before the publication of her own personal S.C.U.M. Manifesto, Rebels on the Backlot included this gem: "I think you'll regret your nasty behavior when you read the book. But that'll be way late in the day."

So it's clear that Waxman's vision is a bit clouded by contempt. But is that a proper excuse for sloppy journalism? Here are a few random facts I collected in relation to films mentioned in the article:

  • World gross of the "disasterous" I <3>: $21 million; it never expanded beyond 900 screens in the U.S.
  • Domestic gross of One Hour Photo, which Waxy holds up as the hit that makes her miss Mark Romanek: $31 million on a fairly wide, 1,330 screen release
  • Domestic gross of Fight Club, which, as Waxy conveniently forgets, was considered a bomb until a year or two into its DVD release: $37 million on 2,000 screens
  • Blatant lies peddled about David O. Russell: at least one. She claims he's "not close" to making a film, but that might have something to do with the fact that he's producing a pilot for FX. He's also attached to direct a Vince Vaughn project, according to IMDB.

I could go on and on, but I have work to do. Bottom line: It's one thing that Waxman chose Hollywood journalism as an outlet for her obvious contempt for film and filmmakers; it's another that her hate speech is consistently propelled by petty, personal issues, and is quite often verifiably inaccurate.

Labels: , ,


Continue reading...

The History of the 20th Century via You Tube

Chapter One: The Miseducation of Flavor Flav



"We're considering you for a part in our new production. How do you feel about playing a controversial Negro?"
"Yeah, I'm with it."



Apparently.

Labels: ,


Continue reading...

Friday, February 02, 2007

What Fresh Hell Hath Harvey Wrought?


Factory Girl opens in NY today and, like most local critics, David Edelstein could barely condescend to spit out a coupla hundred dismissive words. But his final line caught my eye: "Factory Girl does suggest a resonant topic for future cultural-studies classes: the evolution of the downtown film scene from Warhol to Weinstein."

Obviously, Edelstein's not seriously trying to do much more than jab at Harvey for ordering a rush job on what would still probably end up a bad film. But really: how odd, to equate cultural relevancy with zip code. Beyond the easy joke, the sentence itself doesn't make any sense: no one engaged in serious scholarly pursuit would suggest that Harvey Weinstein shares any kind of common ancestry with the Anthology Film Archives set.

A more interesting case could be made linking Weinstein back to Warhol, not in the context of geogrphical center, but as birds of a feather -- culture vultures, born manipulators; insecure men with sharp eyes for talent and a tendency (or compulsion) to overshadow the stars they create. But I'd argue that what Harvey lacks in ingenuity or vision, he makes up in loyalty. This is a man who is by all accounts unbearable to be around, and yet filmmakers tend to join up with him for life. For all of the Harvey Scissorhands lore that goes around, filmmakers as varied as Kevin Smith and Anthony Minghella can testify that box office success aside, once you've learned how to work for Harvey, Harvey will always give you a place to work. Unlike Andy, who famously sucked his "friends" dry only to discard them, leaving them, as Edelstein puts it, "trapped in—and destroyed by—their roles." Moth men might have shared an instinct to conquer lesser personalities, but ironically, Harvey managed to turn that into a business model by being -- and this is the kicker -- a nicer guy.

Edelstein seems to imply that Harvey has somehow killed the underground film scene, but of course that's not it at all -- he was never interested in "underground," or even "art". Any attempts he's made to find unknown talent have only been in the name of keeping up front costs down so as to maximize returns. I'm no Weinstein apologist -- I've been as harsh as anyone on the post-Miramax output, and I haven't seen Factory Girl, and I probably won't. But to give the impression that Harvey Weinstein is somehow more exploitative than Andy Warhol is just lazy.

Labels: , , , ,


Continue reading...

Groundhog Day



A long article in the British newspaper the Independent says "Groundhog Day" is "hailed by religious leaders as the most spiritual film of all time." Perhaps not all religious leaders have seen anything by Bergman, Bresson, Ozu and Dreyer, but never mind: They have a point, even about a film where the deepest theological observation is, "Maybe God has just been around a long time and knows everything."

---Roger Ebert

Labels: , ,


Continue reading...